SC-014: from a documented conflict to a verified correction

Starting point: two different return periods

This example is fictional. On example-store.test a product page says “30-day returns”, while the returns policy says “14-day returns”. In this example both statements apply to the same product and the same market.

The finding is given the ID SC-014. Both URLs and both original statements go into the report, so the conflict can be read without opening the store.

Set your actual return period

The conflict does not establish which period is correct. Provide the actual return period for this product and market so the correction reflects your policy.

If that detail is missing, list it as an open item. Neither an AI nor a service provider should invent a period to fill the gap.

Define the full scope of the change

Compare both sources and every other page or theme block that repeats the same statement. Back up the affected content, then use your actual return period at each location.

Verify the correction against the same criteria

The task is complete when your actual return period appears in the same form at every affected live location inside the review scope, and the result lists the URLs that were read again.

If a page stays unreachable, that limitation remains visible. The finding is then rechecked during the follow-up scan instead of being marked as done.